External pitch deck

A six-slide leadership narrative connecting claims automation, provider quality and platform delivery.

Product decision
Show the decisions behind automation rather than combining unrelated outcomes.

Document type

External pitch deck

Contents

3 sections · 1 table · about 1 min

Status

Portfolio sample · written from my healthcare claims experience

Product decision

Show the decisions behind automation rather than combining unrelated outcomes.

Portfolio sample from my healthcare product experience. Requirements, thresholds and review records are illustrative; they are not employer documents or historical sign-offs.

Audience and ask

The audience is leaders evaluating product judgment and delivery depth. My ask is to examine how I balance operational value, identity quality and continuity across three separate experiences.

1. operational value
2. identity quality
3. continuity across three separate experiences

The audience is leaders evaluating product judgment and delivery depth

Six-slide narrative

Each slide has a distinct claim and the evidence boundary that supports it.

Slide	Message	Evidence boundary
1	Manual claims work can be transformed	Paper claims to EDI 837 experience
2	Automation needs accountable exceptions	Reconstructed requirement and review contract
3	Provider identity is a product dependency	Central API and normalization experience
4	Platform ownership requires 0→1 delivery	Internally built replacement experience
5	Outcomes must be attributed correctly	400,000+ paper claims converted to EDI 837; 99% provider match in a proof of concept
6	Controls and continuity enable scale	Sample gates, not historical approvals

1. Manual claims work can be transformed
2. Automation needs accountable exceptions
3. Provider identity is a product dependency
4. Platform ownership requires 0→1 delivery
5. Outcomes must be attributed correctly
6. Controls and continuity enable scale

Decision requested

More than 400,000 paper claims were converted to EDI 837, an 80-person team was redeployed and the business saved about $1M a year. Provider work improved latency and reporting; platform work replaced a legacy claims integration. The discussion centers on alternatives, dependencies and operating controls. Administrative gains are not presented as clinical outcomes.

1. More than 400,000 paper claims were converted to EDI 837 an 80-person team was redeployed and the business saved about $1M a year
2. Provider work improved latency and reporting
3. platform work replaced a legacy claims integration

Administrative gains are not presented as clinical outcomes